Phase-by-Phase Workflow
Navigation: phase-workflows | index
Step-by-step estimator actions for every phase of a design-build manufacturing plant project. The scenario thread throughout is a real-world type example: a Midwest food & beverage manufacturer adding two new automated filling lines in a 35,000 SF building expansion.
Phase 0: RFP Receipt and Project Kickoff
Section titled “Phase 0: RFP Receipt and Project Kickoff”Your first job is to understand the project before you price it.
Step 0.1 — Receive and Log the RFP Documents
Section titled “Step 0.1 — Receive and Log the RFP Documents”- Create a project folder with consistent naming convention
- Log every document received (drawing list, specifications, geotech, survey, addenda)
- Note the proposal due date and work backward to build your bid schedule
- Identify who owns each estimate section (self-perform vs. sub-bid)
Step 0.2 — RFP Review and Scope Understanding
Section titled “Step 0.2 — RFP Review and Scope Understanding”Read documents in this order:
- Project narrative / scope of work — understand what the owner wants
- Contract form and GMP provisions — understand risk exposure before pricing anything
- Specifications (Division 01 first) — general requirements govern the whole project: insurance, bonding, LDs, warranty, allowances
- Drawings — civil/site → structural → architectural → mechanical → electrical → process
As you read, mark up three lists: things that are clear (can be priced), things that are ambiguous (need RFI), things that are missing (need assumption or exclusion).
Step 0.3 — Issue Pre-Bid RFIs
Section titled “Step 0.3 — Issue Pre-Bid RFIs”List every unresolved question and submit as formal RFIs. Never price over an unresolved ambiguity without a written assumption in the BOE.
Step 0.4 — Develop the Bid Schedule
Section titled “Step 0.4 — Develop the Bid Schedule”Work backward from the proposal due date:
- Day -X: Send bid packages to subcontractors (allow 10–15 working days for mechanical/electrical)
- Day -3: Sub quote receipt deadline
- Day -2: Bid leveling complete; internal estimate finalized
- Day -1: Internal review and QC
- Day 0: Proposal submitted
Phase 1: Conceptual / ROM Estimate (Class 5)
Section titled “Phase 1: Conceptual / ROM Estimate (Class 5)”Design completeness: 0–5% | Used for: feasibility screening
- Collect minimum parameters: GSF, facility type, rough equipment list, site location
- Apply $/SF parametric benchmarks from historical database, RSMeans, C&W Industrial Guide
- Add process equipment estimate: use ratio from similar projects (e.g., equipment = 60% of building cost for this line type)
- Add soft costs and contingency: design fees 6–12%, permitting 1–3%, owner’s contingency 20–30%, escalation at 12–18 month project midpoint
- Produce one-page ROM summary — state clearly: “This is a Class 5 estimate with accuracy -30% to +50%. For feasibility screening only; not suitable for budget commitment.”
Phase 2: Feasibility / Preliminary Estimate (Class 4)
Section titled “Phase 2: Feasibility / Preliminary Estimate (Class 4)”Design completeness: 5–15% | Used for: project authorization, internal capital request
Minimum documents needed: conceptual site plan, preliminary equipment list, PFDs, utility requirements (compressed air SCFM, chilled water tons, electrical kVA).
Equipment-Based Estimate (Lang/Hand Factor Method)
Section titled “Equipment-Based Estimate (Lang/Hand Factor Method)”For process-heavy manufacturing plants, the equipment factored method is standard at Class 4:
- Develop equipment list with FOB purchase price for each major item
- Apply a Lang Factor:
- Solids processing: Lang ≈ 3.9
- Mixed solids/fluids: ≈ 4.1
- Fluids processing: ≈ 4.7
- Lang factor accounts for: installation labor, piping, electrical, instrumentation, civil, structural, insulation, painting, indirect costs
Scenario: Two filling lines at $2.1M FOB each. Lang 4.0. TIC = $2.1M × 4.0 = $8.4M per line → $16.8M total.
Develop separate parametric estimate for building and site. Combine with contingency 20–30%.
Phase 3: FEED / Class 3 Estimate — GMP Candidate
Section titled “Phase 3: FEED / Class 3 Estimate — GMP Candidate”Design completeness: 10–40% | This is the most commercially critical phase in design-build.
Minimum FEED Documents Required
Section titled “Minimum FEED Documents Required”- Architectural floor plans and sections
- Structural framing plans (enough for steel tonnage)
- Mechanical P&IDs issued for design (IFD)
- Electrical single-line diagram (SLD) with load schedule
- Equipment list with budgetary vendor quotes for major items
- Plot plan / site plan
Process
Section titled “Process”- Issue sub-bid packages early — do not wait for complete drawings. Send structural steel, mechanical, electrical, roofing, concrete/site, process equipment install packages with scope description and design maturity statement
- Self-perform takeoff while subs are quoting: earthwork cut/fill volumes, concrete CY, structural steel tonnage
- Receive and level sub quotes — see Subcontractor Bidding and Bid Leveling
- Assemble estimate in CSI MasterFormat order (Div 01–49)
- Develop contingency by category — not a flat %:
- Design development: 8–12%
- Scope gap: 3–5%
- Execution: 3–5%
- Total at Class 3: 15–25%
- Assemble BOE and GMP proposal — attach drawing list, sub quote log, present to owner
Phase 4: GMP Finalization (Class 2 / Class 1)
Section titled “Phase 4: GMP Finalization (Class 2 / Class 1)”Design completeness: 50–100%
GMP-Ready Checklist
Section titled “GMP-Ready Checklist”Before committing, confirm:
- All major equipment specified and vendor-quoted (or purchased)
- Major sub scopes bid and leveled
- Geotechnical report complete
- Permits identified with known fees
- Schedule developed to Level 3 with cost-loaded baseline
Process
Section titled “Process”- Full bottom-up QTO from near-complete or IFC drawings — see Quantity Takeoff and CSI MasterFormat
- Buy out remaining sub scopes — minimum two quotes per major scope
- Finalize contingency — at Class 2, total contingency typically 8–12%
- Internal estimate review — scope coverage check, document compliance check, reasonableness check ($/SF vs. benchmarks), math check, senior estimator/PM review
Phase 5: Construction — Change Orders and Cost Tracking
Section titled “Phase 5: Construction — Change Orders and Cost Tracking”- Price change orders as they arise — see Change Order Management
- Support monthly EVM reporting — see Earned Value and Cost Control
- Track contingency consumption against the risk register
Phase 6: Closeout and Lessons Learned
Section titled “Phase 6: Closeout and Lessons Learned”- Reconcile final contract value vs. original GMP (total changes, final contingency remaining)
- Capture actual costs vs. estimate by CSI division — produce variance analysis
- Document root causes of significant overruns or underruns
- Extract parametric data (final $/SF, $/unit) for the historical cost library
- Conduct team lessons-learned session
This data feeds your next Class 5 estimate for a similar project.
Advisor content
Continue reading with Advisor
This article is part of our Advisor library — written from real projects, not generic explainers.
- Full Support tier vault — equipment, integration, commissioning, takeoff, and more
- Practitioner-level guidance from real projects
- Unlimited AI questions across the Support corpus
$19/mo Support · $49/mo Advisor · $99/mo Principal · cancel anytime
Already subscribed? Sign in